CANON 17 55MM F2 8 REVIEW



Canon 17 55mm F2 8 Review

Canon 17-55mm f2.8 APS-C Lens Review Is it good? YouTube. Quelle est la diffГ©rence entre Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC et Canon EF-S 17-55 F/2.8 IS USM? DГ©couvre lequel est le meilleur et leur performance gГ©nГ©rale dans le classement objectifs pour Canon., At 50mm wide open (f/2.8) the Canon EF-S 17-55/2.8 seems to have a slight sharpness edge over the Sigma 17-55/2.8, perhaps more noticeably at the edge of the frame than in the center, but as the lenses are stopped down the differences disappear. Again, at the long end of their zoom range these two lenses were very close in performance.

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM DxOMark

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Review Sharpness 2. 05/11/2010В В· Check some of my other videos for examples of this lens in use. I've been using this lens for about 3 months now. It's stays on my camera every day. But there aren't many practical reviews around, 05/11/2010В В· Check some of my other videos for examples of this lens in use. I've been using this lens for about 3 months now. It's stays on my camera every day. But there aren't many practical reviews around.

04/03/2006В В· Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II As noted in its own review, the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II is a really nice little lens. Compared to the Canon lens, it's a bit less well-behaved wide open, with more Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Canon EOS 100D Canon EOS 1200D Canon EOS 20D Canon EOS 30D Canon EOS 350D Canon EOS 400D Canon EOS 40D Canon EOS 450D Canon EOS 500D Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 550D Canon EOS 700D Canon EOS 70D Canon EOS 750D Canon EOS 760D Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Buy Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens featuring EF-S-Mount Lens/APS-C Format, 27.2-88mm (35mm Equivalent), Aperture Range: f/2.8 to f/22, Two UD and Three Aspherical Elements, Super Spectra Coating, Ring-Type Ultrasonic Motor AF System, Optical Image Stabilizer, Rounded 7-Blade Diaphragm. Review Canon null Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Canon EOS 100D Canon EOS 1200D Canon EOS 20D Canon EOS 30D Canon EOS 350D Canon EOS 400D Canon EOS 40D Canon EOS 450D Canon EOS 500D Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 550D Canon EOS 700D Canon EOS 70D Canon EOS 750D Canon EOS 760D Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS 7D Mark II

17/09/2019 · But it’s also the most expensive 16-55mm f2.8 lens to date, a little pricier than the Fujifilm version, and much more so than the Canon and Nikon 17-55mm f2.8 DSLR models, although these are considerably older designs. If you are going to Purchase a Canon EF-S 17-55mm F/2.8 IS Lens for video, try to get a recent one (perhaps 2012/2013/2014) because the I.S. Image Stabilization appears to be much quieter than on earlier ones. I believe Canon has incorporated internal revisions to accomplish this. I have a 17-55mm (purchased 11-2013) and side by side with a

17/09/2019 · But it’s also the most expensive 16-55mm f2.8 lens to date, a little pricier than the Fujifilm version, and much more so than the Canon and Nikon 17-55mm f2.8 DSLR models, although these are considerably older designs. 07/03/2011 · I wanted to let you know what I think of this lens after using it for a few months.It's not built as well as "L" series lenses but it's close and the optics are as good in my opinion. One of the

VoilГ  un zoom ultra performant, qui permet de prendre des photos comme on les rГЄve. Le stabilisateur fonctionne vraiment bien et les photos de pГ©nombre revivent avec le EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM. Je l'ai achetГ© avec un canon 400D. Les rГ©sultats depuis bientГґt un an sont une panoplie de photos quasi pro qui me ravies. Je le conseille aux At 50mm wide open (f/2.8) the Canon EF-S 17-55/2.8 seems to have a slight sharpness edge over the Sigma 17-55/2.8, perhaps more noticeably at the edge of the frame than in the center, but as the lenses are stopped down the differences disappear. Again, at the long end of their zoom range these two lenses were very close in performance

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Review Review Roundup

canon 17 55mm f2 8 review

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Digital Photography Review. At 50mm wide open (f/2.8) the Canon EF-S 17-55/2.8 seems to have a slight sharpness edge over the Sigma 17-55/2.8, perhaps more noticeably at the edge of the frame than in the center, but as the lenses are stopped down the differences disappear. Again, at the long end of their zoom range these two lenses were very close in performance, Quelle est la diffГ©rence entre Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC et Canon EF-S 17-55 F/2.8 IS USM? DГ©couvre lequel est le meilleur et leur performance gГ©nГ©rale dans le classement objectifs pour Canon..

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Digital Photography Review

canon 17 55mm f2 8 review

Sony E 16-55mm f2.8 G review Verdict - Cameralabs. Avec son ouverture constante de f/2,8 sur l'ensemble de la plage focale et son stabilisateur d'image Г  trois vitesses, l'objectif EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM garantit des performances et une flexibilitГ© de cadrage remarquables en basse lumiГЁre. Quelle est la diffГ©rence entre Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC et Canon EF-S 17-55 F/2.8 IS USM? DГ©couvre lequel est le meilleur et leur performance gГ©nГ©rale dans le classement objectifs pour Canon..

canon 17 55mm f2 8 review

  • Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Review Sharpness 2
  • Canon EF-S 17-55/2.8 IS USM vs. Sigma 17-50/2.8 Photo
  • Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS Lens Review YouTube

  • 07/03/2011В В· I wanted to let you know what I think of this lens after using it for a few months.It's not built as well as "L" series lenses but it's close and the optics are as good in my opinion. One of the At 50mm wide open (f/2.8) the Canon EF-S 17-55/2.8 seems to have a slight sharpness edge over the Sigma 17-55/2.8, perhaps more noticeably at the edge of the frame than in the center, but as the lenses are stopped down the differences disappear. Again, at the long end of their zoom range these two lenses were very close in performance

    Quelle est la diffГ©rence entre Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC et Canon EF-S 17-55 F/2.8 IS USM? DГ©couvre lequel est le meilleur et leur performance gГ©nГ©rale dans le classement objectifs pour Canon. VoilГ  un zoom ultra performant, qui permet de prendre des photos comme on les rГЄve. Le stabilisateur fonctionne vraiment bien et les photos de pГ©nombre revivent avec le EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM. Je l'ai achetГ© avec un canon 400D. Les rГ©sultats depuis bientГґt un an sont une panoplie de photos quasi pro qui me ravies. Je le conseille aux

    12/09/2013 · I originally reviewed this lens about 3 years ago, back when I was still throwing videos together on Windows Movie Maker. I've standardized and improved my r... Distortion The EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 USM IS exhibited average distortion figures for a lens in this class. As expected there is relatively pronounced barrel distortion (2%) at …

    Quelle est la diffГ©rence entre Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC et Canon EF-S 17-55 F/2.8 IS USM? DГ©couvre lequel est le meilleur et leur performance gГ©nГ©rale dans le classement objectifs pour Canon. My field work for the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Lens review was done in early spring. After a long, cold winter, the bright new growth on the trees was looking gorgeous to me. The 17-50mm focal length range is nice. It works great for around-the-house shots (inside and out), for landscapes, for full body and head-and-shoulders portraits

    VoilГ  un zoom ultra performant, qui permet de prendre des photos comme on les rГЄve. Le stabilisateur fonctionne vraiment bien et les photos de pГ©nombre revivent avec le EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM. Je l'ai achetГ© avec un canon 400D. Les rГ©sultats depuis bientГґt un an sont une panoplie de photos quasi pro qui me ravies. Je le conseille aux Quelle est la diffГ©rence entre Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC et Canon EF-S 17-55 F/2.8 IS USM? DГ©couvre lequel est le meilleur et leur performance gГ©nГ©rale dans le classement objectifs pour Canon.

    Canon’s EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM is the optically fastest lens the company has produced for EF-S digital SLRs. The big question for EF-S body owners though is why they should pay extra for an f2.8 lens when they could enjoy the longer reach of the EF-S 17-85mm at a lower price and just increase their body’s sensitivity under dim conditions.. It’s a valid point, but there’s still Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Canon EOS 100D Canon EOS 1200D Canon EOS 20D Canon EOS 30D Canon EOS 350D Canon EOS 400D Canon EOS 40D Canon EOS 450D Canon EOS 500D Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 550D Canon EOS 700D Canon EOS 70D Canon EOS 750D Canon EOS 760D Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS 7D Mark II

    canon 17 55mm f2 8 review

    12/09/2013В В· I originally reviewed this lens about 3 years ago, back when I was still throwing videos together on Windows Movie Maker. I've standardized and improved my r... 22/02/2019В В· This is a review of the Canon 17-55m f2.8 lens for crop sensor cameras. This is an opinion based review. I feel like the lens is good overall though it is not the "best" one out there. The main

    Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Digital Photography Review

    canon 17 55mm f2 8 review

    Canon EF-S 17 55 mm F2.8 IS lens Digital Photography Review. Distortion The EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 USM IS exhibited average distortion figures for a lens in this class. As expected there is relatively pronounced barrel distortion (2%) at …, 04/03/2006 · Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II As noted in its own review, the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II is a really nice little lens. Compared to the Canon lens, it's a bit less well-behaved wide open, with more.

    Canon EF-S 17-55 mm f/2.8 IS USM review LensTip.com

    Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Review Review Roundup. 07/03/2011В В· I wanted to let you know what I think of this lens after using it for a few months.It's not built as well as "L" series lenses but it's close and the optics are as good in my opinion. One of the, 04/03/2006В В· Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II As noted in its own review, the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II is a really nice little lens. Compared to the Canon lens, it's a bit less well-behaved wide open, with more.

    12/09/2013В В· I originally reviewed this lens about 3 years ago, back when I was still throwing videos together on Windows Movie Maker. I've standardized and improved my r... 05/11/2010В В· Check some of my other videos for examples of this lens in use. I've been using this lens for about 3 months now. It's stays on my camera every day. But there aren't many practical reviews around

    This sets it apart from the closest Canon equivalent, the aging EF-S 17-55mm F2.8 IS USM lens for APS-C. That lens lacks a lot of premium features found in the Fuji and fails to deliver nearly as compelling a performance. The XF 16-55mm feels every bit as well made as most 24-70mm full frame lenses, and handles extremely well. Quelle est la diffГ©rence entre Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC et Canon EF-S 17-55 F/2.8 IS USM? DГ©couvre lequel est le meilleur et leur performance gГ©nГ©rale dans le classement objectifs pour Canon.

    04/03/2006В В· Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II As noted in its own review, the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II is a really nice little lens. Compared to the Canon lens, it's a bit less well-behaved wide open, with more Pre-PMA 2006: Canon has today announced an interesting new constant aperture 'digital' (EF-S) lens. The new EF-S 17 - 55 mm F2.8 IS is designed specifically for the dimensions of a 'cropped sensor' (1.6x crop) and hence can be made smaller than a 35 mm equivelant lens.

    VoilГ  un zoom ultra performant, qui permet de prendre des photos comme on les rГЄve. Le stabilisateur fonctionne vraiment bien et les photos de pГ©nombre revivent avec le EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM. Je l'ai achetГ© avec un canon 400D. Les rГ©sultats depuis bientГґt un an sont une panoplie de photos quasi pro qui me ravies. Je le conseille aux At 50mm wide open (f/2.8) the Canon EF-S 17-55/2.8 seems to have a slight sharpness edge over the Sigma 17-55/2.8, perhaps more noticeably at the edge of the frame than in the center, but as the lenses are stopped down the differences disappear. Again, at the long end of their zoom range these two lenses were very close in performance

    If you are going to Purchase a Canon EF-S 17-55mm F/2.8 IS Lens for video, try to get a recent one (perhaps 2012/2013/2014) because the I.S. Image Stabilization appears to be much quieter than on earlier ones. I believe Canon has incorporated internal revisions to accomplish this. I have a 17-55mm (purchased 11-2013) and side by side with a Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Canon EOS 100D Canon EOS 1200D Canon EOS 20D Canon EOS 30D Canon EOS 350D Canon EOS 400D Canon EOS 40D Canon EOS 450D Canon EOS 500D Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 550D Canon EOS 700D Canon EOS 70D Canon EOS 750D Canon EOS 760D Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS 7D Mark II

    Buy Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens featuring EF-S-Mount Lens/APS-C Format, 27.2-88mm (35mm Equivalent), Aperture Range: f/2.8 to f/22, Two UD and Three Aspherical Elements, Super Spectra Coating, Ring-Type Ultrasonic Motor AF System, Optical Image Stabilizer, Rounded 7-Blade Diaphragm. Review Canon null 17/09/2019 · But it’s also the most expensive 16-55mm f2.8 lens to date, a little pricier than the Fujifilm version, and much more so than the Canon and Nikon 17-55mm f2.8 DSLR models, although these are considerably older designs. So the Sony E 16-55mm f2.8 is priced high, doesn’t have optical stabilisation and again I wish it focused closer, but there

    17/09/2019 · But it’s also the most expensive 16-55mm f2.8 lens to date, a little pricier than the Fujifilm version, and much more so than the Canon and Nikon 17-55mm f2.8 DSLR models, although these are considerably older designs. So the Sony E 16-55mm f2.8 is priced high, doesn’t have optical stabilisation and again I wish it focused closer, but there At 50mm wide open (f/2.8) the Canon EF-S 17-55/2.8 seems to have a slight sharpness edge over the Sigma 17-55/2.8, perhaps more noticeably at the edge of the frame than in the center, but as the lenses are stopped down the differences disappear. Again, at the long end of their zoom range these two lenses were very close in performance

    12/09/2013В В· I originally reviewed this lens about 3 years ago, back when I was still throwing videos together on Windows Movie Maker. I've standardized and improved my r... If you are going to Purchase a Canon EF-S 17-55mm F/2.8 IS Lens for video, try to get a recent one (perhaps 2012/2013/2014) because the I.S. Image Stabilization appears to be much quieter than on earlier ones. I believe Canon has incorporated internal revisions to accomplish this. I have a 17-55mm (purchased 11-2013) and side by side with a

    VoilГ  un zoom ultra performant, qui permet de prendre des photos comme on les rГЄve. Le stabilisateur fonctionne vraiment bien et les photos de pГ©nombre revivent avec le EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM. Je l'ai achetГ© avec un canon 400D. Les rГ©sultats depuis bientГґt un an sont une panoplie de photos quasi pro qui me ravies. Je le conseille aux My field work for the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Lens review was done in early spring. After a long, cold winter, the bright new growth on the trees was looking gorgeous to me. The 17-50mm focal length range is nice. It works great for around-the-house shots (inside and out), for landscapes, for full body and head-and-shoulders portraits

    At 50mm wide open (f/2.8) the Canon EF-S 17-55/2.8 seems to have a slight sharpness edge over the Sigma 17-55/2.8, perhaps more noticeably at the edge of the frame than in the center, but as the lenses are stopped down the differences disappear. Again, at the long end of their zoom range these two lenses were very close in performance Canon’s EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM is the optically fastest lens the company has produced for EF-S digital SLRs. The big question for EF-S body owners though is why they should pay extra for an f2.8 lens when they could enjoy the longer reach of the EF-S 17-85mm at a lower price and just increase their body’s sensitivity under dim conditions.. It’s a valid point, but there’s still

    This sets it apart from the closest Canon equivalent, the aging EF-S 17-55mm F2.8 IS USM lens for APS-C. That lens lacks a lot of premium features found in the Fuji and fails to deliver nearly as compelling a performance. The XF 16-55mm feels every bit as well made as most 24-70mm full frame lenses, and handles extremely well. Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Canon EOS 100D Canon EOS 1200D Canon EOS 20D Canon EOS 30D Canon EOS 350D Canon EOS 400D Canon EOS 40D Canon EOS 450D Canon EOS 500D Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 550D Canon EOS 700D Canon EOS 70D Canon EOS 750D Canon EOS 760D Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS 7D Mark II

    Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Canon EOS 100D Canon EOS 1200D Canon EOS 20D Canon EOS 30D Canon EOS 350D Canon EOS 400D Canon EOS 40D Canon EOS 450D Canon EOS 500D Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 550D Canon EOS 700D Canon EOS 70D Canon EOS 750D Canon EOS 760D Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS 7D Mark II My field work for the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Lens review was done in early spring. After a long, cold winter, the bright new growth on the trees was looking gorgeous to me. The 17-50mm focal length range is nice. It works great for around-the-house shots (inside and out), for landscapes, for full body and head-and-shoulders portraits

    Canon 17-55mm F/2.8 IS USM review YouTube. 17/09/2019 · But it’s also the most expensive 16-55mm f2.8 lens to date, a little pricier than the Fujifilm version, and much more so than the Canon and Nikon 17-55mm f2.8 DSLR models, although these are considerably older designs., Canon’s EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM is the optically fastest lens the company has produced for EF-S digital SLRs. The big question for EF-S body owners though is why they should pay extra for an f2.8 lens when they could enjoy the longer reach of the EF-S 17-85mm at a lower price and just increase their body’s sensitivity under dim conditions.. It’s a valid point, but there’s still.

    Canon 17-55mm f2.8 APS-C Lens Review Is it good? YouTube

    canon 17 55mm f2 8 review

    Fuji XF 16-55mm F2.8 LM WR Review DustinAbbott.net. 12/09/2013 · I originally reviewed this lens about 3 years ago, back when I was still throwing videos together on Windows Movie Maker. I've standardized and improved my r..., Distortion The EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 USM IS exhibited average distortion figures for a lens in this class. As expected there is relatively pronounced barrel distortion (2%) at ….

    Canon EF-S 17-55 mm f/2.8 IS USM review LensTip.com. This sets it apart from the closest Canon equivalent, the aging EF-S 17-55mm F2.8 IS USM lens for APS-C. That lens lacks a lot of premium features found in the Fuji and fails to deliver nearly as compelling a performance. The XF 16-55mm feels every bit as well made as most 24-70mm full frame lenses, and handles extremely well., Quelle est la diffГ©rence entre Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC et Canon EF-S 17-55 F/2.8 IS USM? DГ©couvre lequel est le meilleur et leur performance gГ©nГ©rale dans le classement objectifs pour Canon..

    Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM DxOMark

    canon 17 55mm f2 8 review

    Canon 17-55mm f2.8 APS-C Lens Review Is it good? YouTube. 17/09/2019 · But it’s also the most expensive 16-55mm f2.8 lens to date, a little pricier than the Fujifilm version, and much more so than the Canon and Nikon 17-55mm f2.8 DSLR models, although these are considerably older designs. So the Sony E 16-55mm f2.8 is priced high, doesn’t have optical stabilisation and again I wish it focused closer, but there If you are going to Purchase a Canon EF-S 17-55mm F/2.8 IS Lens for video, try to get a recent one (perhaps 2012/2013/2014) because the I.S. Image Stabilization appears to be much quieter than on earlier ones. I believe Canon has incorporated internal revisions to accomplish this. I have a 17-55mm (purchased 11-2013) and side by side with a.

    canon 17 55mm f2 8 review


    07/03/2011В В· I wanted to let you know what I think of this lens after using it for a few months.It's not built as well as "L" series lenses but it's close and the optics are as good in my opinion. One of the 12/09/2013В В· I originally reviewed this lens about 3 years ago, back when I was still throwing videos together on Windows Movie Maker. I've standardized and improved my r...

    Quelle est la diffГ©rence entre Tamron SP 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II VC et Canon EF-S 17-55 F/2.8 IS USM? DГ©couvre lequel est le meilleur et leur performance gГ©nГ©rale dans le classement objectifs pour Canon. This sets it apart from the closest Canon equivalent, the aging EF-S 17-55mm F2.8 IS USM lens for APS-C. That lens lacks a lot of premium features found in the Fuji and fails to deliver nearly as compelling a performance. The XF 16-55mm feels every bit as well made as most 24-70mm full frame lenses, and handles extremely well.

    13/10/2019 · Full review. This lens has been available since 2006, when it was launched as the fastest standard zoom lens for Canon’s APS-C DSLRs. And the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM is still the fastest – and highest priced – of Canon’s EF-S lenses. Spanning focal lengths between 27.2mm and 88mm in 35mm format, it provides a constant f/2.8 maximum At 50mm wide open (f/2.8) the Canon EF-S 17-55/2.8 seems to have a slight sharpness edge over the Sigma 17-55/2.8, perhaps more noticeably at the edge of the frame than in the center, but as the lenses are stopped down the differences disappear. Again, at the long end of their zoom range these two lenses were very close in performance

    Distortion The EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 USM IS exhibited average distortion figures for a lens in this class. As expected there is relatively pronounced barrel distortion (2%) at … Canon’s EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM is the optically fastest lens the company has produced for EF-S digital SLRs. The big question for EF-S body owners though is why they should pay extra for an f2.8 lens when they could enjoy the longer reach of the EF-S 17-85mm at a lower price and just increase their body’s sensitivity under dim conditions.. It’s a valid point, but there’s still

    13/10/2019 · Full review. This lens has been available since 2006, when it was launched as the fastest standard zoom lens for Canon’s APS-C DSLRs. And the EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM is still the fastest – and highest priced – of Canon’s EF-S lenses. Spanning focal lengths between 27.2mm and 88mm in 35mm format, it provides a constant f/2.8 maximum 12/09/2013 · I originally reviewed this lens about 3 years ago, back when I was still throwing videos together on Windows Movie Maker. I've standardized and improved my r...

    22/02/2019 · This is a review of the Canon 17-55m f2.8 lens for crop sensor cameras. This is an opinion based review. I feel like the lens is good overall though it is not the "best" one out there. The main Canon’s EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM is the optically fastest lens the company has produced for EF-S digital SLRs. The big question for EF-S body owners though is why they should pay extra for an f2.8 lens when they could enjoy the longer reach of the EF-S 17-85mm at a lower price and just increase their body’s sensitivity under dim conditions.. It’s a valid point, but there’s still

    Pre-PMA 2006: Canon has today announced an interesting new constant aperture 'digital' (EF-S) lens. The new EF-S 17 - 55 mm F2.8 IS is designed specifically for the dimensions of a 'cropped sensor' (1.6x crop) and hence can be made smaller than a 35 mm equivelant lens. My field work for the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Lens review was done in early spring. After a long, cold winter, the bright new growth on the trees was looking gorgeous to me. The 17-50mm focal length range is nice. It works great for around-the-house shots (inside and out), for landscapes, for full body and head-and-shoulders portraits

    04/03/2006В В· Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II As noted in its own review, the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II is a really nice little lens. Compared to the Canon lens, it's a bit less well-behaved wide open, with more 05/11/2010В В· Check some of my other videos for examples of this lens in use. I've been using this lens for about 3 months now. It's stays on my camera every day. But there aren't many practical reviews around

    12/09/2013В В· I originally reviewed this lens about 3 years ago, back when I was still throwing videos together on Windows Movie Maker. I've standardized and improved my r... Buy Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens featuring EF-S-Mount Lens/APS-C Format, 27.2-88mm (35mm Equivalent), Aperture Range: f/2.8 to f/22, Two UD and Three Aspherical Elements, Super Spectra Coating, Ring-Type Ultrasonic Motor AF System, Optical Image Stabilizer, Rounded 7-Blade Diaphragm. Review Canon null

    22/02/2019В В· This is a review of the Canon 17-55m f2.8 lens for crop sensor cameras. This is an opinion based review. I feel like the lens is good overall though it is not the "best" one out there. The main Pre-PMA 2006: Canon has today announced an interesting new constant aperture 'digital' (EF-S) lens. The new EF-S 17 - 55 mm F2.8 IS is designed specifically for the dimensions of a 'cropped sensor' (1.6x crop) and hence can be made smaller than a 35 mm equivelant lens.

    Canon’s EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM is the optically fastest lens the company has produced for EF-S digital SLRs. The big question for EF-S body owners though is why they should pay extra for an f2.8 lens when they could enjoy the longer reach of the EF-S 17-85mm at a lower price and just increase their body’s sensitivity under dim conditions.. It’s a valid point, but there’s still Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Canon EOS 100D Canon EOS 1200D Canon EOS 20D Canon EOS 30D Canon EOS 350D Canon EOS 400D Canon EOS 40D Canon EOS 450D Canon EOS 500D Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 550D Canon EOS 700D Canon EOS 70D Canon EOS 750D Canon EOS 760D Canon EOS 7D Canon EOS 7D Mark II

    17/09/2019 · But it’s also the most expensive 16-55mm f2.8 lens to date, a little pricier than the Fujifilm version, and much more so than the Canon and Nikon 17-55mm f2.8 DSLR models, although these are considerably older designs. So the Sony E 16-55mm f2.8 is priced high, doesn’t have optical stabilisation and again I wish it focused closer, but there Buy Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens featuring EF-S-Mount Lens/APS-C Format, 27.2-88mm (35mm Equivalent), Aperture Range: f/2.8 to f/22, Two UD and Three Aspherical Elements, Super Spectra Coating, Ring-Type Ultrasonic Motor AF System, Optical Image Stabilizer, Rounded 7-Blade Diaphragm. Review Canon null

    17/09/2019 · But it’s also the most expensive 16-55mm f2.8 lens to date, a little pricier than the Fujifilm version, and much more so than the Canon and Nikon 17-55mm f2.8 DSLR models, although these are considerably older designs. So the Sony E 16-55mm f2.8 is priced high, doesn’t have optical stabilisation and again I wish it focused closer, but there Voilà un zoom ultra performant, qui permet de prendre des photos comme on les rêve. Le stabilisateur fonctionne vraiment bien et les photos de pénombre revivent avec le EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS USM. Je l'ai acheté avec un canon 400D. Les résultats depuis bientôt un an sont une panoplie de photos quasi pro qui me ravies. Je le conseille aux